A common tactic of politicians – and worse, their followers– is
fear. Instead of providing good reasons to vote for their candidate, they tell
me why I should be afraid of the opponent. Both sides do it, and it is quite
effective. It helps all politicians to avoid actually having to work for their
points, but gets their most ardent and extreme followers to do the work for
them.
So it is no surprise that having expressed that we might vote
for a Democratic candidate, my wife and I are often assailed with the
accusatory question, "So you're going to vote for the baby killer?" This
is intended to fill me with fear and revulsion, because of course no one wants
to see babies killed, or even think about babies being destroyed. I see this as
a common tactic of the right to employee against people like myself who, though
being Christian, lean politically to the left, where presumably all of us
believe in a woman's right to choose to terminate a pregnancy. Remember that to
most Republicans, to vote Democratic, in any way, is to vote for the devil.
And I must admit, the question does put me into a moral and
philosophical quandary. Because I actually am one of those people, in a very
small minority, who still believe that at the moment of conception a human
being is formed. However, I believe that the question demonstrates that most
people have actually missed the point. And in this case I believe it is
Republicans who have grossly oversimplified the question in order to mask the
horrible, inhuman, ideologies which many Republicans espouse.
Here’s the thing: I believe that to be pro-life, one must be pro living.
To take the argument where it really needs to go, conservatives
have to understand that the babies they want to come into the world need food
and shelter and clothing, and most conservatives are not willing to provide
that. In fact, most conservatives have chosen to vilify and demonize anyone in
need. Further, because of a number of inconsistent and baffling, and frankly
made up moral ideals, most conservatives also have worked to block any sort of
birth control that would keep pregnancy from occurring in the first place.
Thus, it is Republicans who create more abortions.
The word innocent, as in "innocent babies being murdered"
to use the phrase of fear mongers, implies a level of deservedness. So,
supposedly an unborn child deserves to be born, even though that person has
actually done nothing wrong or right to deserve death or life. But let us say, for the sake of argument, the
conservatives are right and that by having done nothing wrong, an unborn child
does not deserve to be destroyed. Then why is it that a born child does not
deserve food and shelter and clothing on the basis of what his or her parents
may or may not have done? If conservatives -- who use the Bible as a weapon to
try to claim that unborn children deserve life -- are honest, then they have to
understand that Christianity is based not on what people deserve. If this
vision of the Bible is correct, then no one deserves anything. The psalmist states, “[God] does not
deal with us according to our sins, nor repay us according to our iniquities”
(Psalm 103:10). Paul
writes, “for all have sinned and fall short of
the glory of God, 24 and
are justified by his grace as a gift,
through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus” (Romans 6:23-24,
emphasis mine). Therefore,
the whole argument about what is right and wrong concerning or based on whether
someone deserves something is invalid.
Four years ago, conservatives touted their candidate, Mitt
Romney, as a "job creator." Now many of them are willing to put their
vote behind a man whose bankruptcies have cost other people thousands of jobs,
and yet he has not had to pay the price for his business failures. This is a
man who is willing to see other people out of work as long as he keeps his own
britches. This is a man who does not pay his bills. And when someone tries to
sue him in order to get what they are owed, he uses his lawyers to put those
people out of business. It seems reasonable to me to expect those who
supposedly value human life to be on the side of those whose lives are irreparably
damaged by this person.
I had to accept years ago that it really does not matter who is
president when it comes to abortion. The legality of abortion is never going to
change. Whether Clinton or Trump are occupying the White House, it will still
be legal for women to terminate a pregnancy under particular circumstances, and
under very strict guidelines (which Trump claims, but cannot prove, are
frequently circumvented). Abortion as a topic is just something that gets everybody all excited and
angry and afraid. Call me fatalistic, but barring Trump’s implied rebellion and
a paramilitary takeover of this country, the legality of abortion procedures is
not going to change.
I frankly do not like Mrs. Clinton. And I don't believe she is
going to be a great president. I do believe that she will be able to help
protect the access to birth control that will prevent more unwanted
pregnancies, and therefore more abortions. It may well be that Hillary Clinton
is very interested in herself, and her personal agendas. But those agendas may
well be what protects more human life than the lie that comes from Mr. Trump.
To Donald Trump, a man who has been captured in war is not a hero. To Donald
Trump a poor person is not deserving of any benefit, but a “loser.” To Donald
Trump a disabled person is fodder for jokes, and that women should be judged on
their physical attractiveness to him and their willingness to have sex with him.
Donald Trump believes that America will be great only when he is in charge of
it. This man is a child. And I don't understand why we would vote for an
adolescent whose libido is the driving force of his decisions.
So yes, I am voting for the supposed baby killer. And the reason
is I value human life.